PFAS (Forever Chemicals) In Your Sex Lube?

Reckitt Benckiser (RB), a multinational consumer goods conglomerate, has found itself at the center of a scandal that epitomizes the worst aspects of corporate greed, corruption, and disregard for human welfare.

The revelation that its K-Y Jelly personal lubricants contain PFAS—highly toxic “forever chemicals”—is not just a failure of quality control but a damning indictment of the systemic flaws in neoliberal capitalism.

Reckitt’s actions have caused untold harm to public health, exacerbated economic inequality, and contributed to environmental degradation.

This scandal is an in-your-face reminder of how corporations prioritize profits over ethics, leaving consumers and communities to bear the brunt of their misconduct.


PFAS in K-Y Jelly

The presence of PFAS (per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances) in Reckitt Benckiser’s K-Y Jelly lubricants is nothing short of a public health crisis. PFAS are synthetic chemicals notorious for their persistence in the environment and human body, earning them the moniker “forever chemicals.” These substances do not break down over time and accumulate in tissues, leading to long-term exposure risks even at minuscule levels.

Toxic Effects on Human Health

PFAS exposure has been linked to severe health consequences, including:

  • Cancer: PFAS compounds have been associated with kidney, testicular, and other cancers.
  • Immune Suppression: These chemicals weaken the immune system, making individuals more susceptible to infections and reducing vaccine efficacy.
  • Reproductive Harm: PFAS disrupt hormonal systems, leading to decreased fertility and developmental issues in children.
  • Liver Damage: Chronic exposure can impair liver function, increasing the risk of metabolic diseases.
  • Endocrine Disruption: PFAS interfere with thyroid hormones, which regulate metabolism and growth.

What makes this scandal particularly egregious is the intended use of K-Y Jelly on sensitive genital tissues. These areas are highly permeable, allowing for rapid absorption of chemicals into the bloodstream. During sexual activity, elevated body temperatures further enhance this absorption.

Reckitt’s failure to disclose the presence of PFAS in its products has exposed countless consumers to these risks without their knowledge or consent.

Oral Exposure Risks

In addition to dermal absorption, PFAS can enter the body orally during sexual activity. This dual route of exposure amplifies the health risks, particularly for individuals who use these products frequently or over extended periods.

The fact that Reckitt marketed these lubricants as “gentle” and “body-friendly” compounds this betrayal. Consumers believed they were using safe products, only to find themselves unwitting participants in a toxic experiment.


Economic Fallout

Reckitt Benckiser’s misconduct has far-reaching economic implications that extend well beyond individual consumers:

Healthcare Burden

The health effects of PFAS exposure translate directly into increased healthcare costs for individuals and society.

Treating conditions like cancer, liver disease, and infertility requires expensive medical interventions that many cannot afford. For lower-income individuals—who are often disproportionately affected by corporate malfeasance—these costs can be catastrophic.

Loss of Consumer Trust

Scandals like this erode public confidence in corporate brands and regulatory systems. Consumers who once trusted Reckitt’s products now face uncertainty about what other hidden dangers might lurk in everyday items. This erosion of trust impacts not just Reckitt but also ethical companies striving to maintain high standards.

Economic Inequality

Reckitt’s actions disproportionately harm marginalized communities. Wealthier consumers may have access to safer alternatives or legal recourse, but lower-income individuals often lack these options. This dynamic exacerbates existing wealth disparities—a hallmark of neoliberal capitalism where corporations externalize costs onto the most vulnerable while reaping profits for shareholders.


The Environmental Legacy of Forever Chemicals

The environmental impact of PFAS contamination is as alarming as its effects on human health:

Water Pollution

PFAS leach into water supplies through industrial waste and consumer product disposal. Once in the water system, they are nearly impossible to remove using conventional treatment methods. Millions now face contaminated drinking water—a crisis that disproportionately affects rural areas with limited infrastructure.

Soil Contamination

PFAS persist in soil for decades, disrupting ecosystems and contaminating crops. Farmers unknowingly irrigate their fields with polluted water, introducing these chemicals into the food chain.

Wildlife Harm

Animals exposed to PFAS suffer from bioaccumulation—the buildup of toxins in their bodies over time. This not only endangers individual species but also disrupts entire ecosystems.

Reckitt’s failure to eliminate PFAS from its products contributes directly to this environmental catastrophe.

By prioritizing cost-cutting over sustainability, the company has ensured that its toxic legacy will outlive us all.


Neoliberal Capitalism Is A System That Rewards Corporate Misconduct

The Reckitt Benckiser scandal is not an isolated incident; it is a symptom of systemic failures inherent in neoliberal capitalism:

  1. Regulatory Capture: Weak enforcement mechanisms allow corporations to operate with impunity. Regulatory agencies often lack the resources or political will to hold powerful companies accountable.
  2. Profit Maximization: The relentless pursuit of shareholder value incentivizes unethical behavior. Companies cut corners on safety and transparency to boost short-term profits.
  3. Externalized Costs: Corporations shift the burden of their misconduct onto consumers, workers, and the environment while pocketing the gains.

This system creates a perverse incentive structure where harming public health becomes a rational business decision.


What Needs to Change For Corporations To Be Held Accountable?

To prevent future scandals like this one, we must demand systemic reforms that prioritize public welfare over corporate profits:

Stronger Regulations

Governments must enforce stricter labeling requirements and ban harmful chemicals like PFAS from consumer products altogether. Regulatory agencies need more funding and authority to investigate corporate misconduct effectively.

Transparency Requirements

Companies should be required to disclose all ingredients used in their products—including potential contaminants like PFAS—and undergo regular third-party audits.

Significant Financial Penalties

Fines for corporate misconduct must exceed any profits gained from unethical practices. Reckitt should face substantial financial penalties that reflect both the harm caused and the need for deterrence.

Consumer Advocacy

Grassroots movements can amplify consumer voices and hold corporations accountable through boycotts, public awareness campaigns, and legal action.


Fighting Back Against Corporate Power

Grassroots activism is essential for challenging corporate misconduct:

  • Unionizing Workers: Empowering employees through unions can counterbalance corporate dominance by advocating for safer workplace practices.
  • Boycotts: Organized boycotts can pressure companies like Reckitt into adopting ethical practices by targeting their bottom line.
  • Public Awareness Campaigns: Educating consumers about harmful products fosters informed decision-making and reduces demand for unethical brands.

These efforts disrupt the status quo and pave the way for systemic change.


Reckitt Benckiser’s Ethical Failure

Reckitt Benckiser’s decision to include toxic PFAS chemicals in its K-Y Jelly lubricants represents a profound ethical failure with devastating consequences for public health, economic equity, and environmental sustainability.

This scandal underscores the urgent need for systemic reforms that hold corporations accountable for their actions.

As long as neoliberal capitalism allows companies to prioritize profits over people, Reckitt’s story will remain a cautionary tale rather than an anomaly.

It is up to regulators, activists, and consumers alike to demand better—to insist on a world where corporate responsibility is not optional but mandatory.

Reckitt may claim that it enriches lives through innovation—but until it addresses its ethical failures head-on, such claims ring hollow.

The time has come for corporations like Reckitt Benckiser to choose accountability over greed—or face the consequences of their actions at last.


Many more corporations put PFAS (forever chemicals) in their everyday products.

Here are just a small handful:


šŸ’” Explore Corporate Misconduct by Category

Corporations harm people every day — from wage theft to pollution. Learn more by exploring key areas of injustice.